"Ralph A. Zingaro, C.V. Philip, Rayford G. Anthony and Argentina Vindiola
Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843 U.S.A.
Received 30 June 1980;
Abstract
Liquid sulfur dioxide has been found to be an excellent solvent for coal derived liquids. The higher alkanes and mineral matter are insoluble in this solvent and they are effectively separated. The sulfur dioxide-soluble fraction is very low in ash content. However, no improvement is achieved with respect to sulfur content. The soluble fraction has been separated by gel permeation chromatography and a large number of components have been identified."
First, when SO2 - which we presume could be extracted and made from the coal feed itself - is used to "clean" liquids derived from coal, it would, we think, be expected that "no improvement is achieved with respect to sulfur content".However, minerals and other, perhaps unwanted, substances "are effectively separated".
And, this report comes from Texas A&M University. Again, we question the now-obvious decentralization of coal-to-liquid conversion development and research; and, the fact that so much of it has seemingly been performed by institutions not geographically situate at the center of our US coal universe.
Finally, though, this is another "dated" report - from 1980 - which has no apparent broad publication credits. Why, would you speculate, has there been so little apparently achieved since then?
If you do look for an answer, perhaps you should check out back. Maybe somebody hid one in the Bushes.