WV Coal Member Meeting 2024 1240x200 1 1

Bugs Eat Coal Fumes/Sewage, Poop Gasoline

 

This information is from the University of Minnesota's College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences.
 
We submit it to affirm the fact that strategic developments are underway which will enable us, one way or the other, to make full use of our coal resources, including the by-products of it's employment in our generation of power and in our synthesis of liquid fuels.
 
Some excerpts:

"Mass Culture of Microalgae for Biofuels

The Center for Biorefining received $1 million funding from MN DOC, MCES, and IREE to support research on developing transferable technologies for B. Harvested algae will be used as a biomass feedstock for biodiesel and other renewable energy production.  The specific objectives of the project are to (1) test and develop photobioreactors (PBR), (2) study the growth characteristics of some collected algae strains, (3) evaluate and develop harvest and oil extract processes.  Several PBRs were developed and studied. More than 30 strains were screened, and some of them were found to grow well on wastewater. A simple harvest technique was also developed. Production of high oil content microalgae for biodiesel fuel, coupled with wastewater treatment and flue gas emission control, provides significant environmental benefits and improves the economic feasibility of the whole approach."
 
 (Once again, as we've been saying. - JtM)
 
 "Pilot Microwave Assisted Pyrolysis System
 
The Center has recently installed a pilot Microwave Assisted Pyrolysis (MAP) system in its pilot lab. The system is designed to process biomass feedstocks ranging from corn stover to wood chips to MSW (Municipal Solid Waste - JtM) to bio-oils, burnable gas, and char solids.  The technical advantages of microwave assisted pyrolysis (MAP) over conventional pyrolysis include: (1) Microwave heating is uniform and easy to control; (2) It does not require high degree of feedstock grinding (e.g., large chunk of wood logs can be used) and can handle mixed feedstock (e.g., municipal solid wastes); (3) The conversion products (pyrolytic gas and bio-oils) are cleaner than those from gasification and conventional pyrolysis because our process does not have to use biomass powder and does not require agitation and fluidization; (4) The syngas produced has higher heating value since it is not diluted by the carrying gas for fluidizing the biomass materials. (5) Microwave heating is a mature technology and development of microwave heating system for biomass pyrolysis is of low cost. Wood wastes, sludge, slaughter wastes, municipal solid wastes have been tested with microwave pyrolysis."
 
(You will, we hope, recall our report of research in Poland on the use of microwave radiation to efficiently remove Sulfur and Nitrogen from coal flue gas, and to help convert them into worthwhile compounds. Other references indicate that coal, too, can be subjected to microwave pyrolysis. And, again as we've otherwise documented, a lot of things can be "gasified" along with coal, and the gasses subsequently reformed into useful products - such as liquid fuels. - JtM)
 

"New IREE funding for our thermochemical conversion R&D

Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment awards $4.85 million to seven breakthrough projects including our project titled "Catalytic Reforming of Liquids and Gases from Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass."

Liquid fuels account for more than 45% of the total energy use in the U.S. Liquid fuels have high energy densities, are easy to transport, store, and handle, and are distributed through established infrastructure. Therefore biomass derived liquid fuels have a great potential to replace petroleum-based liquid fuels. Pyrolysis is the most common thermochemical process to convert solid biomass to bio-oils. Use of as produced bio-oils is impractical because of their poor combustion properties, low heating value, and high storage instability. The goal of the research is to develop processes to turn liquids and gases from thermochemical conversion of biomass to high quality hydrocarbon liquid fuels.  Our research will be focused on the understanding and development of several innovative conversion and upgrading/reforming processes that (1) convert solid biomass to bio-crude and syngas using catalytic pyrolysis  and gasification , (2) upgrade bio-crude to high quality liquid and (3) catalytically reform syngas to liquid fuels. The mechanistic studies will be conducted in Ruan and Ye’s labs with in situ pyrolysis analyzers and other advanced instruments."
 
We note that this work, in Minnesota, seems to complement somewhat similar studies we reported at Iowa State University.

Coal vs. Corn: Tortilla Riots

 
 
We have cautioned against the use of agricultural products and land for liquid fuel - ethanol - production, warning that it was unwise and shortsighted in a hungry world.
 
Problems have already begun, and the bio fuels industry is still in it's infancy.
 
Some excerpts from the link follow, but other reports characterize the Mexican demonstrations as "riots".
 
"Tens of thousands of people have marched through Mexico City in a protest against the rising price of tortillas. "

"The price of the flat corn bread, the main source of calories for many poor Mexicans, recently rose by over 400%. "

"President Felipe Calderon has said the government will clamp down on hoarding and speculation to ease the problem."

"But some blame the rise on demand for corn to make environmentally-friendly biofuels in the United States."

The poorest of people will be the ones victimized by turning valuable agricultural land toward the inefficient production of ethanol. If it's ethanol we want - or methanol, diesel and gasoline , we can make it all from coal, and various wastes. We don't have to steal food from the poor to keep our Caddie's rolling.

Arizona Coal Gasification

 
This story posted a few days ago, and it's all about how funds from the recently-enacted economic stimulus package will go to a coal gasification project - a project in Arizona.
 
Some comments follow this excerpt: 

"Stimulus Funds Go To Cholla

July 1, 2009.

    Arizona Public Service Co. (APS) Cholla Power Plant is set to receive approximately $70.6 million in federal stimulus funds for a coal gasification project.

    According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Cholla plant was selected in May to receive $70.6 million from a $2.4 billion program to “expand and accelerate the commercial deployment of carbon capture and storage technology.” The funds come from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

    The DOE notes, “The funding is part of the Obama administration's ongoing effort to develop technologies to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas and contributor to global climate change, into the atmosphere while creating new jobs.”

    Energy Secretary Steven Chu explained, “To prevent the worst effects of climate change, we must accelerate our efforts to capture and store carbon in a safe and cost-effective way. This funding will both create jobs now and help position the United States to lead the world in CCS (carbon capture and storage) technologies, which will be increasing in demand in the years ahead.”

    An announcement by the DOE noted that the intent of the project at Cholla Power Plant is to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while still using domestic energy sources, such as coal.

    “...funding will permit the existing algae-based carbon mitigation project to expand testing with a coal-based gasification system,” the announcement explained. “The goal is to produce fuels from domestic resources while reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions. The overall process will minimize production of carbon dioxide in the gasification process to produce a substitute natural gas from coal. The host facility for this project is the Cholla Power Plant...”

    According to DOE, coal gasification not only reduces carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions, but also produces useful by-products, such as sulfur.

    “In some methods, the sulfur can be extracted in either a liquid or solid form that can be sold commercially,” a DOE publication notes.

    That same publication explains the gasification process. “Rather than burning coal directly, gasification breaks down coal into its basic chemical constituents. In a modern gasifier, coal is typically exposed to steam and carefully controlled amounts of air or oxygen under high temperatures and pressures. Under these conditions, molecules in coal break apart, initiating chemical reactions that typically produce a mixture of carbon monoxide, hydrogen and other gaseous compounds.”

    Hydrogen resulting from the process, as well as some of the other gasses released from the coal, is then used to generate power.
 
(Or, the Hydrogen and Carbon Monoxide can be re-combined, via Fischer-Tropsch and related technologies, to synthesize liquid fuels and chemical manufacturing feed stocks. - JtM)

    APS is one of only two companies specifically named by the DOE when the funding was announced. A Ramgen power plant in Bellevue, Wash., will receive $20 million for “testing of an existing advanced carbon dioxide compression project.” The remainder of the $2.4 billion in clean energy stimulus funds will be used for various projects that are part of either a clean coal initiative, carbon capture and storage project, geological sequestration site identification or geological sequestration research.
 
(So, they are still wasting money geological sequestration. - JtM)

    “DOE’s Recovery Act projects will stimulate private sector infrastructure investments due to the significant amount of cost sharing that will occur in all large-scale projects to be selected for implementation,” the DOE notes. “These combined public and private investments will establish a proving ground for creating a safe, reliable, widely-available, environmentally responsible and affordable CCS (carbon capture and storage) infrastructure.”"
 
(Note that they already have an "algae-based" Carbon Dioxide mitigation facility at Cholla, which they will expand to accept emissions from the coal gasification plant. As we have documented, the algae can then either be harvested and co-gasified with the coal, or used for bio diesel production - if they've thought that far ahead. - JtM)
 
It sounds like a great project, except that they plan to burn the syngas in a power generator rather than convert it into liquid fuel, via Fischer-Tropsch processing.
 
And, they're still talking about expensive and wasteful geologic sequestration of Carbon Dioxide, while at the same time spending money on the more-advantageous algal recycling of Carbon Dioxide.

Coal Plus Biomass - The Next Generation of Fuels

 
 
First, in case you weren't aware of innovation, an intro:
 
"innovation: America's Journal of Technology Commercialization, formerly TechComm, is a bimonthly magazine published ... in partnership with the US Department of Energy. It reports on new technologies, entrepreneurial activity, topics of interest to investors, activity at DOE and other national laboratories, and issues concerning technology transfer."
 
Some excerpts, edited, as indicated, for concision:
 
Next-Gen Fuels--What’s Old Is New Again
 
June/July 2008
 
By Howard Brown
 
"Al Darzins ... at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ... finds himself spending a lot of time these days looking at ... some of the laboratory’s earli­est research. As group manager ... he is overseeing several “new” research efforts that build on some very old ones. His efforts are aimed at converting biomass—algae and plant-derived materials—into fuels."

"“Previous biofuels work performed at NREL under various programs has provided a strong foundation for our current efforts to kick-start that research again,” says Darzins."

"Today ... three of these technologies—the production of pyrolysis oil, liquefied synthesis gas (both of which can be obtained from coal) and microalgal oil—are once again attracting a lot of attention."
 
"Coal was once the transportation fuel of choice for the United States ... But ... gasoline and diesel fuel became the domi­nant transportation fuels."

"... it can be well worth expending energy to convert solid fuels—whether they be biomass or coal—to liquids. By heating biomass to very high temperatures with limited or no oxygen, researchers can either liquefy or gasify it. When biomass is lique­fied, the resulting pyrolysis oil can be used after pretreatment as a feedstock for conventional oil refining. When it is gasified, the synthesis gas can be catalytically converted to liquid fuels that substitute well for diesel or gasoline."

"In fact, the pyrolysis and gasification technologies used for converting biomass to liquids were initially ap­plied to coal to produce petroleum substitutes. With a strong utility interest in integrated gasification and combined-cycle technologies for coal power (so-called “clean coal” technologies), gasifier technology has advanced significantly."

(Note of the foregoing. It emphasizes the point that CoalTL technologies can be applied to some biomass. CoalTL and BioTL are not just complementary, but, because of the biological carbon cycle, synergistic.)
 
"While the core technology has advanced, biomass pyrolysis and gasification are gaining renewed interest in part because of the emphasis on producing ethanol from cellulosic biomass, such as wood chips and plant leaves and stalks."
 
"Cellulosic biomass is made up of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Cellulose and hemicellulose are plant-derived, sugar-based polymers, and biological biomass conversion technology can ferment the sugars to ethanol. But lignin, the third major component of biomass—making up 15 to 25 percent of biomass by weight—does not contain sugars."

"Until recently, NREL’s process designs for ethanol production called for burning the lignin to provide heat and power for the ethanol plant. But with transpor­tation fuels as a top priority, the new thought is to use multiple technologies to produce fuels. Because thermochem­ical processing can produce fuels from any biomass source (and coal!), not just sugars, researchers can use it to convert the lig­nin and any other residue from biologi­cal processing to additional ethanol or other liquid fuels within the same bio­refinery." (As we have been suggesting.)

"Also, biological processing is currently focused on agricultural residues such as cornstalks and husks. Other biomass—particularly softwoods (i.e., cellulose ), which may be­come extensively available from forest thinning operations—is more challeng­ing for fermentation and may be more suitable for pyrolysis or gasification (as applied to coal)."


"Full Circle on Pyrolysis Research"

"NREL’s research on biomass pyrolysis has returned to its roots. (It's roots lie in coal gasification for "town gas" production, as we've documented - in the 1800's. The gas wasn't liquefied, as in the following.) Pyrolysis involves liquefying biomass by first heating it to about 550C in the absence of oxygen and then condensing the vapors. The resulting pyrolysis oil is a complex mix­ture analogous to crude oil (except that it contains oxygen) and can be burned as fuel or, after pretreatment, used as a feedstock for con­ventional oil refineries."

"NREL’s original pyrolysis research had that direct product as its objective, but in the late 1980s, the laboratory turned its focus to making specific fuel ad­ditives or other petrochemicals from pyrolysis vapors before they condensed."
 
"NREL researchers worked on crack­ing the vapors to aromatic hydrocarbons and olefins that could be used as gasoline blends." (They worked on it. Why did they stop?)

"“The goal is to make pyrolysis oil (obtainable from coal, biomass and sewage sludge) a stan­dard petroleum refinery feedstock,” says Czernik (NREL researcher Stefan Czernik). One project is exploring the suitabil­ity of pyrolysis oil derived from lignin (from trees) for such a feedstock. NREL produces the pyrolysis oil, and research part­ners at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and UOP LLC, a private petroleum research company, hydrotreat it; that is, they upgrade it by removing impurities. Among other things, the process removes oxygen, which is the primary difference between pyrolysis oil and crude petroleum."
 
UOP - Honeywell

"NREL is conducting techno-economic and life-cycle analyses of the biorefinery pathway involving lignin pyrolysis and hydrotreating to determine how profit­able it will be, what kinds of energy and environmental impacts it would have, and what changes could be made to most effectively improve that profitabil­ity and impact."

"A second project seeks to upgrade pyrolysis oil during its  production by reacting either the condensed oil or the oil vapors with ethanol (which can also be obtained from coal - JtM) . Researchers expect this process to reduce the acidity of the pyrolysis oil and make it more stable, both of which would improve its suit­ability as an oil refinery feedstock."

"Because of the potential for either hydrotreating or ethanol upgrading, or a combination of both, the future for pyrolysis oil appears bright."

"“We think pyrolysis is a powerful tech­nology and are eager to use it to help meet transportation fuel needs,” says Czernik."

From Solid to Gas to Liquid

"Another approach to converting solid biomass into a liquid fuel is to first con­vert it into a gas. NREL scientists gasify biomass to a mixture of carbon monox­ide and hydrogen, known as synthesis gas or syngas (Just as can be done with coal), by taking the pyrolysis process a step further—heating it to about 850C with about one-third the oxygen needed for efficient combustion."

"In the 1990s, syngas (from coal) was envisioned pri­marily as a fuel for electrical power gen­eration, with a focus first on large utility systems and then on smaller distributed generation systems. The shift from elec­tricity production back to liquid fuels is in large measure a tribute to the great gains made by wind turbines, solar cells and other renewable energy technolo­gies for power generation. When it comes to liquid transportation fuels, however, biomass is the only renewable game in town."

"Conversion of syngas to liquids also has a colorful and somewhat dark history. Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch first studied conversion of syngas into larger, useful organic compounds in 1923. Using syngas made from coal and metal catalysts, they were able to produce liq­uid hydrocarbons. Fischer-Tropsch sys­tems were used successfully in Germany during World War II and South Africa during apartheid embargoes when each faced limited oil supplies. Several commercial Fischer-Tropsch operations continue today, and the term Fischer-Tropsch has come to be applied to any catalytic conversion of syngas to liquid fuel."

"The NREL syngas-to-liquid system bub­bles the gas through an oil slurry under high pressure, with the catalyst sus­pended in the liquid. While traditional Fischer-Tropsch processes seek to pro­duce non-oxygenated hydrocarbons, NREL’s objective is to produce ethanol or perhaps “higher alcohols”—a mixture of ethanol and larger-molecule alcohols."

"“The process is similar to Fischer-Tropsch or methanol reformation,” says NREL scientist Steve Deutch, “but we stop it at an earlier stage.”"

"Producing ethanol from syngas would be an ideal companion technology for a biorefinery that ferments biomass into ethanol because the syngas process would produce ethanol from mate­rial that cannot be fermented, such as lignin (and coal! - JtM). Because both processes would produce ethanol, the approach would avoid the need for additional infrastruc­ture to deliver another product, such as a lignin-derived chemical."

"NREL is currently working with PNNL on a joint effort to produce al­cohols from syngas. PNNL is working to improve the catalyst, while NREL is focusing on improving the process con­ditions and testing the catalyst and pro­cess against a wide range of operating conditions, using actual syngas derived from biomass."

An Aquatic Approach to Future Fuels

"Yet another early biofuel research area that is back in the spotlight is the con­version of algae to fuels. Although small in size compared to cellulosic ethanol efforts, the NREL research effort on fuels from algae involved extensive research through the 1980s and early 1990s. NREL’s biomass researchers led the way in developing technology for growing microalgae that produce high levels of lipids (oils) for processing into biodiesel. NREL developed an extensive microal­gae culture collection as well as a tool kit for the genetic engineering of these organisms. Former NREL analyst John Sheehan, who managed the last few years of the microalgae program, cited economic factors for its being set aside."

"“In addition to having to compete with 57-cent-per-gallon diesel at the time (That's certainly changed), one of the main reasons for dropping the microalgae program was realizing that even using simple outdoor ponds, the capital cost of facilities for growing the microalgae would always keep the technology relatively expensive,” says Sheehan." ­

“Today, however—in addition to dramatically higher petroleum diesel cost—low plastic container cost makes the possibility of growing the algae in closed systems such as transparent tubular reactors (reactors, we suggest, connected to the exhaust flues of coal-fired power plants and coal-to-liquid conversion factories) a very realistic possibility­ and is making the technology much more attractive again.”"

"NREL scientist Eric Jarvis, a genetic en­gineering specialist, is especially excited about the possibility of restarting micro­algae research because of new capabili­ties developed since the mid-1990s."

"“The metabolic engineering we did to try to make microalgae produce more lipids was cutting edge at the time,” says Jarvis, “but the whole field of genetic engineering has advanced so dramati­cally since then that we will now have far greater ability to improve the organ­isms’ performance.”"

"Another exciting reason for reestablish­ing microalgae research is the possibility of developing a new end product. Rather than converting the microalgal oil to biodiesel, it is possible to chemi­cally convert it to jet fuel. The same hydrotreating process that could make pyrolysis oil a good oil refinery feed­stock could also convert microalgal oil into kerosene, the basic component of jet fuel."
 
(And, again, we can grow the algae in bio-reactors connected to the exhaust flues of our coal plants. We'll note that several airlines, such as Virgin, have tested algae-based jet fuel, as we've documented.)

"Jet fuel now accounts for about 8 percent of our petroleum use and no renewable alternative has been developed to this point. Ethanol is not dense enough, hav­ing only about half the energy per vol­ume of jet fuel. Biodiesel has about 80 percent the energy density of kerosene, but can solidify at the low temperatures of high altitude flight."

Howard Brown is a senior communicator at NREL., and it might well be worth your time to have a few words with him, presuming your interest. We know the foregoing has been an overly-long presentation, but the fact that it is so long serves, we think, to highlight the fact that there are a lot of things going on, developments underway, that could be positive for all of us - West Virginia, the Coal Industry, the US.

Shell Converts Australian Coal


 
We had earlier reported on Shell Oil's Middle Distillate System (MDS(r)), and how they are employing that technology to convert low-rank coal, in Bintulu, Malaysia, and natural gas, in Qatar, into liquid fuels. We had also informed you of Perdaman Chemicals, in Australia, and their work there to convert coal into chemicals and fertilizers.
 
The two companies are combining their expertise in a new Australian coal conversion enterprise, as per this enclosed report.
 
An excerpt: 
 
"COLLIE Urea Project developer Perdaman Chemicals and Fertilisers has announced that Shell has signed a contract to provide coal gasification and gas treatment technology.

The Western Australian-based company also announced two other major contracts for the $3.5 billion plant to Danish company Haldor Topsoe A/S and Netherlands company Stamicarbon BV.

(We had earlier reported to you on the expertise in this field of Haldor Topsoe.)

Perdaman Chemicals and Fertilisers says that each of the technology providers is a world leader in its field and they will all work closely with the contractors to complete the detailed engineering design work for the 2 million tonne per annum plant.

The urea plant will transform sub-bituminous coal into urea - a widely used form of fertiliser - and is slated to generate more than $850 million a year in export earnings for the state.

We'll note, again, that much of China's extensive coal conversion effort is directed to the production of fertilizer. Regardless of what they're making from the coal, though, wouldn't it be a good thing if West Virginia were somehow able to generate an additional "more than $850 million a year in export earnings" for herself?