If you do recall our earlier report, we corrected one error in the article. The story we forwarded referred to this pending coal conversion plant as a "first" for Korea. It won't be. The Japanese were converting coal into liquid fuels there during their occupation of that country during WWII, according to Japanese and US military reports we've sent you.
We believe the following transcription to be accurate. We regret our current inability to link directly to the article for you. Additional comment follows:
"SK Energy, South Korea's largest oil refiner by output, is teaming with domestic steel maker Pohang Iron and Steel Co (Posco) to develop "clean coal" technologies at a total cost of 3.35 trillion won (US$2.6bn, £1.6bn).
The two companies have signed a deal to jointly develop a manufacturing process for synthetic natural gas, according to an announcement at the weekend by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy. The ministry, which regulates economic policy in the industrial and energy sectors, said the two companies' planned facilities would help improve the country's energy security while reducing carbon emissions.
Posco will invest 1 trillion won to build a synthetic natural gas plant in Gwangyang, southwest of Seoul, with an expected annual output of 500,000 tonnes of gas. Posco estimates that its products will replace annual imports of 200bn won of liquefied natural gas.
(We would like to see an economist analyze these numbers. A 1 trillion won-or-whatever investment wouldn't be paid off in 5 years with a 200 billion annual return - there are operating costs & etc. But, that 200bn return would all be circulated within the Korean domestic economy, and it would stop a 200bn leak from that economy to the outside world. Sounds like, at least, a total 400bn/yr won win-win.)
The firms will also work on the production of controversial coal-based oil, known as synthetic crude, through a coal-to-liquid process that would extract materials needed to make chemical products.
SK Energy will spend 1.8 trillion won to build a plant capable of producing 6.3 million barrels of artificial crude oil annually. It would be equal to about 2.5 per cent of the nation's fuel demand for transportation in 2008.
The company has a further 550bn won earmarked for the manufacture of 200,000 tonnes of coal-based industrial chemicals, including methanol and hydrogen.
Coal-to-liquid processes have been widely criticised by green groups, who argue that in many cases they are even more carbon intensive than petroleum.
The federal government will provide funding of 25 billion won towards research and development for the initiatives. It believes that the domestic cultivation of clean coal and synthetic gas technologies, which could be licensed abroad, would help South Korea enter the global energy market in the future.
Earlier this month, South Korea announced details of its $85bn plan to develop eco-friendly industries. The initiative is aimed at creating a green "growth engine" for the nation’s ailing economy."
All of that is great, of course, excepting for the fact that it's South Korea, not West Virginia. And, we'll remind you of another earlier dispatch, in which we reported that the Koreans are working on the full utilization of coal-based resources, including Carbon Dioxide. In brief, we remind you of:
"Promotion of CO2 Hydrogenation in Fixed Bed Recycle Reactors
M.J. Choi, J.S. Kim, S.B. Lee, W.Y. Lee and K.W. Lee
ENR Team, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Taejon 305-600, Korea
Summary
One of the promising technologies for the utilization of CO2 is the selective synthesis of valuable chemicals by means of catalytic hydrogenation. A catalytic fixed bed recycle reactor and series reactors have been proposed to increase the level of reaction conversion in conducting the hydrogenation of CO2. The hydrogenation of CO2 was carried out over Fe-K based catalyst. The conversion of carbon dioxide increased with increasing reaction temperature and residence time in the fixed bed single reactor. ... CO2 (hydrogenation) increased with increasing recycle ratio ... For the olefin rich production, maximum (CO2) was the level of 75% in the recycle reactor, however paraffin selectivity was increased when the (CO2) was above 80%. From the results of experiments, the recycle reactor as an alternative reactor was beneficial ...for the hydrogenation of CO2 instead of the fixed bed single reactor."
So, we could infer that the Koreans are working on the complete package of a sustainable, closed-circle, coal-based liquid fuel economy.
And, finally, to repeat a portion of the initial excerpt:
"The federal government will provide funding of 25 billion won towards research and development for the initiatives. It believes that the domestic cultivation of clean coal and synthetic gas technologies, which could be licensed abroad, would help South Korea enter the global energy market ...".
West Virginia University has the West Virginia Process for converting coal into liquid fuels, and has been working with China in that nation's ambitious coal-to-liquid industrialization, as we've documented. If we could get a domestic coal-to-liquid refinery of our own up and running, and follow that with a CO2 recycling project, wouldn't it then be great if our Mountain State could publicly proclaim it's intent to "enter the global energy market"?
