CO2 Recycling: Another US Patent

 
Scattered among the references, collected by Oregon State University, we sent you earlier to document the fact that Carbon Dioxide can be chemically reduced and converted into hydrocarbons and Oxygen, are mentions of Ruthenium, a Platinum Group metal, as a catalyst for Carbon Dioxide conversion reactions.
 
It is so efficient at splitting Carbon from CO2, and recombining it with Hydrogen to form the hydrocarbon fuel gas, and liquid fuel and chemical manufacturing raw material, Methane, that the reactions can be conducted in a low-heat, low-pressure environment, thus making the process of recycling Carbon Dioxide much more energy efficient.
 
The fact that it works, and works well, is confirmed herein by our own, US, patent examiners in their approval and issuance of Patent 4847231, parts of which we've reproduced below.
 
First, a brief excerpt from the text to emphasize the technology's efficiency:
 
"It is an object of this invention to provide a low pressure and low temperature process for the direct formation of methane from carbon dioxide and hydrogen by a heterogeneous catalytic gas phase reaction."
 
And, note, too, that this patent was issued in 1989. That's not as long ago as Paul Sabatier won the Nobel Prize for demonstrating that CO2 could be effectively recycled, but long ago enough that we should by now have stopped arguing about CO2 emissions from coal-use industries, and be well on our way to domestic liquid fuel self-sufficiency, through the conversion of our abundant coal and the recycling of coal's most abundant by-product.
 
Does anyone know why we are not?
 
PS: Ruthenium, though a somewhat uncommon Platinum Group metal, does have fairly wide-spread natural occurrence, and it can, according to web-based references, be synthesized in relative abundance in some nuclear reactors.
 
Excerpt (presented with overly-dense technical passages deleted. Interested readers are invited to explore through the link, but please do make note of the mention of Fischer-Tropsch coal-to-liquid conversion technology. It all ties in together. - JtM):

US Patent 4847231 - Mixed ruthenium catalyst

US Patent Issued on July 11, 1989

Inventors

  • Gratzell, Michael
  • Kiwi, John
  • Thampi, Krishnan R.


Assignee

  • Gas Research Institute

Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

Heterogeneous catalytic gas phase methane production from hydrogen and carbon dioxide is achieved directly at temperatures as low as 25° C. and at atmospheric pressures by use of a catalyst having a mixture of Ru and RuOx, wherein x is greater than 0 and equal to or less than 2, supported by a suitable metal oxide support. Photo-methanation using such catalysts having photo excitable support materials significantly increases methane production, yielding almost stoichiometrically quantitative amounts of methane according to Sabatier reaction.

2. Description of the Prior Art

Use of ruthenium as a hydrogenation catalyst on a titania support for Fischer-Tropsch reactions of CO and H2 to produce hydrocarbons, principally liquid hydrocarbons at elevated pressure and methane at atmospheric pressure, is known from a number of patents including U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,042,614; 4,477,595; 4,558,030; 4,567,205; and 4,619,910. The 4,047,614 and 4,477,595 patents teach suppression of methane formation in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction when using titania as opposed to alumina or carbon support material.

Nickel is a known hydrogenation catalyst for reforming of methane by reaction of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. U.S. Pat. No. 4,132,672 teaches addition of a small amount of iridium for improved conversion of hydrogen and carbon monoxide to methane.

The electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to methane on Ru electrodes is taught by K. W. Frese, Jr. and S. Leach "Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Methane, Methanol, and CO on Ru Electrodes", Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 132, No. 1, pgs. 259-260, January 1985. This electrochemical reduction works only at low current densities and is not a selective as desired for methane.

Photoreduction of CO2 to methane and higher  hydrocarbon in aqueous solution using Ru or Os colloids as catalysts is taught by Itamar Willner, Ruben Maidan, Daphna Mandler, Heinz Durr, Gisela Dorr and Klaus Zengerle, "Photosensitized Reduction of CO2 to CH4 and H2 Evolution in the Presence of Ruthenium and Osmium Colloids: Strategies to Design Selectivity of Products Distribution", J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 109, No. 20, pgs. 6080-6086, 1987. This photoreduction reaction utilizes Ru metal as an electron transfer catalyst and consumes triethanol amine making the process commercially unattractive.

The Sabatier reaction:

CO2 + 4H2 > CH4 + O2

is a known important catalytic process which despite its favorable thermodynamics, has been difficult to achieve due to high energy intermediates imposing large kinetic barriers and the formation of side products is common. Investigations during recent years aimed toward improving the activity and selectivity of methanation catalysts has been reported, including Lunde, P. J. and Kester, F. L., J. Catal. 30, 423-429 (1973); Phyng Quack, T. Q. and Rouleau, D., J. appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 26, 527-535 (1976); Tomsett, A. D., Hagiwara, T., Miyamoto, A. and Inui, T., Appl. Catal., 26, 391-394 (1986); Solymosi, F., Erdoheli, A. and Bansagi, T., J. Catal. 68, 371-382 (1981); Weatherbee, G. D. and Bartholomew, C. H., J. Catal, 87, 352-362 (1984); and Inui, T., Funabiki, F., Suehiro, M. and Sezume, T., JCS Faraday Trans. 1, 75, 787-802 (1979). Although progress has been made, elevated temperatures of greater than 300° C. and pressures of greater than 1 atmosphere are still required for methane generation to proceed at significant rates and yields according to the Sabatier reaction.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of this invention to provide a low pressure and low temperature process for the direct formation of methane from carbon dioxide and hydrogen by a heterogeneous catalytic gas phase reaction.

It is another object of this invention to provide catalytic gas phase methane production from hydrogen and carbon dioxide using a mixed Ru/RuOx catalyst wherein x is greater than 0 and less than or equal to 2.

It is yet another object of this invention to provide a process for the direct formation of methane from carbon dioxide and hydrogen providing a very selective yield of methane of greater than about 95 percent, and preferably greater than 99 percent.

It is still another object of this invention to provide a process for catalytic direct methanation of carbon dioxide and hydrogen using highly dispersed mixture of Ru/RuOx on a photoexcitable catalyst support material wherein the reaction rate is significantly enhanced through photoexcitation of the support material.

The catalyst used in the process of this invention is a mixed ruthenium catalyst of about 10 to about 90 percent Ru and about 10 to about 90 weight percent RuOx, wherein x is greater than 0 and less than and equal to 2. The mixed ruthenium catalyst is highly dispersed on a suitable metallic oxide support with Ru loading of about 1 to about 15 percent. Specifically, a mixed ruthenium catalyst of about 25 mole percent Ru and about 75 mole percent RuOx loaded onto a TiO2 support material, Ru loading of 3.8 percent, has been found to provide very selective, greater than 99 percent, yield of methane by direct reaction of CO2 and H2 at about ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure. Reaction rates may be enhanced in the order of four to five times by photoexcitation of the TiO2 support material under photoexcitation of the support material stoichiometry according to the Sabatier reaction continued to be greater than 99 percent at 1 atmosphere pressure and 46° C.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The process of this invention provides highly selective direct formation of methane from carbon dioxide and hydrogen according to the stoichiometry of the Sabatier reaction. High methane selectivity and yield is achieved at low temperatures and low pressures by use of a catalyst of a mixture of Ru and RuOx

The mixed ruthenium portion of the catalyst comprises about 10 to about 90 mole percent Ru and about 10 to about 90 mole percent RuOx wherein x is a number greater than 0 and less than and equal to 2. Preferred proportions of the mixed ruthenium catalyst are about 15 to about 35 mole percent Ru and about 65 to about 85 mole percent RuOx. Catalytic activity of the mixed ruthenium catalyst has been found to be superior to use of the fully reduced Ru or the unreduced RuO2 in the methanation reaction.

The support portion of the catalyst is a metal oxide which may be photoinsensitive for dark methanation or a semiconducting oxide for light activated methanation. highly dispersed on specific metal oxide support materials.

Loading of mixed Ru and RuOx on the support material in accordance with this invention should be about 1 to about 15 weight percent of the total mixed ruthenium/support material catalyst, preferably about 2.5 to about 7.5 weight percent. The powdered catalyst of this invention may be used in catalytically effective quantities and in any suitable manner known to the art for conduct of solid catalyst/gas phase reactions as known to the art. Hourly space velocities up to 100,000 h-1 have been employed and gave good conversions.

The direct reduction of carbon dioxide to methane by hydrogen according to the Sabatier reaction is highly selectively achieved by the process of this invention under low pressure and low temperature conditions. The process of this invention is carried out by passing gaseous carbon dioxide and hydrogen in contact with the mixed ruthenium/metallic oxide support catalyst of this invention. It is preferred that hydrogen be present in stoichiometric excess amounts, about 1 to about 5 times the stoichiometric amount required for the Sabatier reaction being suitable, about 2 to about 4 times stoichiometric hydrogen being preferred. The process for direct formation of methane from carbon dioxide and hydrogen according to this invention is carried out at low pressure, ambient up to about 10 atm, preferably ambient to about 3 atm. The process is suitably carried out at low temperatures below about 300° C. and preferably below 200° C., ambient to about 200° C. being suitable, about 50° to about 150° being preferred.

The process of this invention appears to proceed directly according to the Sabatier reaction. Analyses of gas mixtures during the process have found no evidence of formation of carbon monoxide and Fischer-Tropsch products, as further set forth specifically in Example II. This has been further confirmed by separate work showing that the hydrogenation of carbon monoxide using the catalyst of this invention requires much higher temperatures than the mild near ambient conditions suitable for the process of this invention. Still further, the direct conversion of carbon dioxide to methane according to the present process has been found to be very selective, the yield of methane being greater than 99 percent under many conditions. To the inventors' knowledge, the catalyst of this invention provides the first process for ambient room temperature conversion of carbon dioxide to methane.

Methane formation and carbon dioxide consumption strictly obeyed the 1:1 stoichiometry of the Sabatier reaction indicating that the catalyst operated in a very selective fashion. This was confirmed by gas chromotograph, mass spectrometry and high pressure liquid chromotography which failed to detect other byproducts. Particularly, the formation of carbon monoxide, methanol, formaldehyde, ethane and higher homologues can be excluded within the detection limit for these compounds which was at least 0.002 μmol per μmol of methane generated. There was no formation of formic acid or oxalic acid.

While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereof, and many details have been set forth for purpose of illustration,

* * * * * it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein can be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.

Other References

  • K W. Frese, Jr. and S. Leach "Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Methane, Methanol, and CO on Ru Electrodes", Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 132, No. 1, pp. 259-260
  • Itamar Willner, R. Maidan, D. Mandler, Heinz Durr, G. Dorr and K. Zergerle, "Photosensitized Reduction of CO2 to CH4 and H2 Evolution in the Presence of Ruthenium and Osmium Colloids; Strategies to Design Selectivity of Products Distribution", J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 109, No. 20, pp. 6080-6086, 1987
  • Lunde, P. J. and Kester, F. L., J. Catal. 30, 423-429 (1973)
  • Phyng Quzck, T. Q. and Rouleau, D., J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 26, 527-535 (1976)
  • Tomsett, A. D., Hagiwara, T., Miyamoto, A. and Inui, T., Appl. Catal., 26, 391-394 (1986)
  • Solymosi, F., Erdoheli, A. and Bansagi, T., J. Catal. 68, 372-381 (1981)
  • Weatherbee, G. D. and Bartholomew, C. H., J. Catal., 87, 352-362 (1984)
  • Inui, T., Funabiki, F., Suehiro, M. and Sezume, T., JCS Faraday Trans. 1, 75, 787-802 (1979)

CO2 Recycling: Oregon State University

Oregon State University, at least at one time, was engaged by NASA to research ways to optimize life support systems aboard the International Space Station, where, according to reports we've already brought to your attention, they utilize Noble Prize-winning Sabatier technology to recycle Carbon Dioxide into Oxygen, and the fuel gas, treated as waste aboard the ISS, Methane.

As part of OSU's efforts, they accumulated a body of reference works detailing research already accomplished on the subject of Carbon Dioxide recycling.

We reproduce, following below, a partial list of their collected references, and call your attention, especially, both to the mention of Sabatier, in research published in 1902, and to the citation: "Lunde, P.J. and Kester, F.L. Carbon Dioxide Methanation on a Ruthenium Catalyst, Ind. Eng. Chem., Process Des. Dev., 13(1):27-33, 1974."

More on Lunde will follow in a separate dispatch. But, here is the list of references demonstrating that we have a far greater understanding of how to profitably utilize the Carbon Dioxide by-product of our coal-use industries as the valuable raw material resource it truly is. We have an understanding of Carbon Dioxide's value that has, however, and for whatever reason, been occluded and subverted.

Joe the Miner

(Note, again: Mention of "Carbon Dioxide Reduction" means not just reduction in the amount of CO2, but the chemical reduction of it into it's elemental components, Carbon and Oxygen. - JtM)

Boyda, R.B., Lee, M.G., and Grigger, D.J., Sabatier Carbon Dioxide Reduction System for Space Station Freedom, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 921189, presented 22nd International Conference on Environmental Systems, Seattle, WA, July 13-16, 1992.

Forsythe, R.K., Verostko, C.E., Cusick, R.J., and Blakely, R.L., A Study of Sabatier Reactor Operation, in Zero "G", SAE Technical Paper Series No. 840936, presented 14th Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, 1984.

Kashiwai, T., Matsumoto, H., Kamishima, N., Hatano, S., Nitta, K., and Ashida, A., Study of Oxygen Recovery Stystem using Reduction of Carbon Dioxide, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 951558, presented at 25th International Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA, July 10-13, 1995.

Lunde, P.J. Modeling, Simulation, and Operation of a Sabatier Reactor, Ind. Eng. Chem., Process Des. Dev., 13(3), 226-232, 1974.

Lunde, P.J. and Kester, F.L. Carbon Dioxide Methanation on a Ruthenium Catalyst, Ind. Eng. Chem., Process Des. Dev., 13(1):27-33, 1974.

Noyes, G.P., Carbon Dioxide Reduction Processes for Spacecraft ECLSS: A Comprehensive Review, SAE Technical Paper Series No., 881042, presented at 18th Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Francisco, CA, July 1988.

Noyes, G.P., and Cusick, R.J., An Advanced Carbon Reactor Subsystem for Carbon Dioxide Reduction, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 860995, presented 16th Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA, July 14-16, 1986.

Otsuji, K., Hanabusa, O., Sawada, T., Satoh, S., and Minemoto, M., An Experimental Study of the Bosch and the Sabatier CO2 Reduction Processes, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 871517, presented 17th Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, Seattle, WA, July 1987.

Sabatier, P., and Senderens, J.B., Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci., 134, 689, 1902.

Samsonov, N.M., Kurmazenko, E.A., Gavrilov, L.I., Farafonov, N.S., Dokunin, I.V., Markin, S.V., Pavlova, T.N., Naumov, V.A., and Jakimenko, A.O., Results of Engineering Development of the Carbon Dioxide Reduction Assembly for a Space Station Integrated Life Support System, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 951557, presented at 25th International Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA, July 10-13, 1995.

Samsonov, N.M. and et al, A Complex of Systems for Oxygen Recovery Aboard a Manned Space Station, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 932275, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1993.

Secord, T.C. and Bonura, M.S., Operational Ninety-Day Manned Test of Regenerative Life Support Systems, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 901257, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1990.

Son, C.H., and Barker, R.S., Comparative Test Data Assessment and Simplified Math Modelling for Sabatier CO2 Reduction Subsystem, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 921228, presented 22nd International Conference on Environmental Systems, Seattle, WA, July 13-16, 1992.

Strumpf, H.J., Chin, C.Y., Lester, G.R., and Homeyer, S.T., Sabatier Carbon Dioxide Reduction System for Long-Duration Manned Space Application, SAE Technical Paper Series No. 911541, presented 21st International Conference on Environmental Systems, San Francisco, CA, July 15-18, 1991.

US Law: Liquefy Coal by 2010

 
 
We herein present excerpts from the US CODE: Title 42.13331:

--------------

Coal research, development, demonstration, and commercial application programs

(a) Establishment
The Secretary shall, in accordance with section  13541 and 13542 of this title, conduct programs for research, development, demonstration, and commercial application on coal-based technologies. Such research, development, demonstration, and commercial application programs shall include the programs established under this part, and shall have the goals and objectives of— ...
 
(4) achieving the cost competitive conversion of coal into energy forms usable in the transportation sector;
(5) demonstrating the conversion of coal to synthetic gaseous, liquid, and solid fuels;
(6) demonstrating, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies, the use of coal-derived fuels in mobile equipment, with opportunities for industrial cost sharing participation;
(7) ensuring the timely commercial application of cost-effective technologies or energy production processes or systems utilizing coal which achieve—
(A) greater efficiency in the conversion of coal to useful energy when compared to currently available commercial technology for the use of coal; and
(B) the control of emissions from the utilization of coal; and
(8) ensuring the availability for commercial use of such technologies by the year 2010.
 
------------
 
In other words, the Secretary of Energy is to ensure that we will have  "such technologies", for the efficient "conversion of coal to synthetic ... liquid ... fuels" available to us "by the year 2010".
 
The deadline is almost upon us.
 
Will Secretary Chu comply?
 
If not, who will enforce the law, and how might his compliance be compelled?

US Coal Patent - Liquids, Power, Low CO2

 

Herein we submit yet another US Patent, in addition to the several other patents, and at least one Nobel Prize, we have brought to your attention which document, beyond reasonable argument, that coal can, efficiently and cleanly, be converted into liquid fuels.
 
Moreover, in confirmation of research we earlier reported, liquid fuel production and power generation, from coal, can be combined in an integrated process, in one facility, thereby adding to coal's already immense value as a source of both electricity and liquid transportation fuels.  
 
As follows:

US Patent 6976362 - Integrated Fischer-Tropsch and power production plant with low CO2 emissions

US Patent Issued on December 20, 2005
Abstract
A plant for producing Fischer-Tropsch liquids and electrical power with greatly reduced emissions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere is made up of a syngas generatpr unit, an air separation unit, a Fischer-Tropsch unit, a CO2 removal unit, and a combined cycle electricity generation unit. Each of Fischer-Tropsch liquids, carbon dioxide, and electrical power can be recoverable under proper economic conditions. Electrical power is recoverable by the use of a gas turbine fueled by predominantly hydrogen and a steam turbine powered by steam generated by cooling exhaust gases from the gas turbine. Sequestration of CO2 and fueling the gas turbine with hydrogen reduces the amount of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere."
 
The Abstract is unfortunately sparse of technical details. Another critical, and disappointing, insufficiency is the almost-obligatory genuflection towards the wasteful concept of "Sequestration".  Someone should write a new patent application specifying the inclusion of a Sabatier-type Carbon Dioxide reactor, such as is employed, as we've documented, on the International Space Station, to convert any excess CO2 into the useful gaseous fuel, and liquid fuel raw material, methane.  
 
Other than that, we have here yet another confirmation, by US Government experts, in this case patent examiners, that very real technology exists to convert our abundant coal, cleanly, efficiently and profitably, into liquid fuels. And, coal will keep our lights on for us while it keeps our cars rolling.
 
What more can we ask?

Coal to Plastics in China

 

We present this report, from a United States Plastics Industry trade journal, confirming that, as we have documented numerous times, China is expanding their coal conversion industry to produce both liquid fuels and raw materials for their manufacturing enterprises.
 
The excerpt:
 
"China pursues coal as path to plastics
 
The primary plastic derived from these efforts has been polyvinyl chloride (PVC), with coal-derived capacity jumping from 2 million tons in 2002 to 7 million by 2007. By 2012, Pang says coal-based methanol and PVC throughput will double from current levels, with more than 90% of China’s PVC being derived from coal. The coal will also be used to produce propylene and ethylene, monomer feedstocks for polypropylene and polyethylene among other resins, with the state backing several large-scale projects. Over the next three to four years, the Middle East will add huge amounts of resin capacity, with much of the production intended for China, but in PVC, at least, Pang says China’s CTL path is economically competitive, with the end product roughly $100 cheaper than PVC derived from petroleum.
 
Pang’s CMAI associate, Steve Zinger, reported at the same conference that there are 12 coal-to-polyolefins projects being looked at in China, calling the effort a “game changer in olefins.” Zinger added, “There’s a lot of internal pressure to get self sufficient in other basic commodities, and certainly ethylene is no exception,” pointing out that as in steel, China’s government will wholeheartedly encourage domestic development of basic industries."
 
Can anyone tell us why the United States government does not, apparently, "wholeheartedly encourage domestic development of basic industries", such as coal-to-liquid conversion for both liquid fuels and plastics manufacturing raw materials?
 
Have we, the United States, become afflicted with something akin to "battered wife" syndrome in our relationship with "O" - Big Oil and OPEC, wherein we're battered, abused and coerced into supporting a greedy and brutal lout, but we're so emotionally addicted to the arrangement that we can't bring ourselves to pack our bags and head out, alone, into a big, scary world?